Housing Price and Inflation
Here is a graph of Canadian housing index (green line, left scale, Bloomberg ticker : CAHUIP Index) and CPI (blue line, left scale, Bloomberg ticker: CACPI Index) over 30 years . I’ve also calculated their 12 month rolling over change (Y/Y) (right scale).
Two things we can see here:
Keynes ever said :
“By a continuing process of inflation, government can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens.”
Housing Price and US Dollar
This is what I found very interesting. The following graph is the inflation adjusted housing price (green, left scale, CAHUIP/CPI) and the US dollar index (blue, right scale, Bloomberg ticker: DXY curncy).
I see only one thing here:
Yesterday FOMC announces FED will buy long-term bonds while sell short-term ones. The intuition result is “OK, long-term bond yield will go down and short-term bond yield will go up”. So is that the case?
I spent some time to study the yield change during the previous FED actions (QE & QE II). By comparing the notional amount in POMO and yield for maturity of 5 yrs, 10 yrs and 20+ yrs, I found something interesting.
Let’s look at the 5 yrs case (10 yrs and 20 yrs cases are similar and graphs are shown in the bottom):
We may notice that at the beginning stage of the QE (I and II), the yield went up as Fed was buying. While on the other hand, the yield went down with QE close to the end. Em. Interesting. So the intuition of price going up when Fed is buying is totally wrong. The real world is much complicated.
Why did that happen?
The real reason could be very complex. I can only put my 2 cents here:
Well, this time may be a little different. The reason 1 is no longer true as no new money is created yesterday. The liquidity issue is not solved and in fact might become worse. But reason 2 may be still valid. Again, as FED buys the long-term bond, its yield can actually become higher gradually.
On the other hand, we may not apply the same logic to the short-term notes here. The intuition of short-term yield going up may be true. The difference here is FED is selling the short-term notes while buying the long term bonds. When he is selling, FED is actually withdraw liquidity from the mkt buy collecting cash. Do we expect ppl will give out their cash for T-notes when everyone is after cash? Well, I don’t think so.
We know when buying bond, you get the return from coupon payment plus the P/L from price change. Let’s ignore the risk side (default, downgrade) for now. It seems reasonable why ppl want to buy bond when it has high yield as it gives good return on coupon, plus a potential good return if price also goes up. But when yield is low, does it mean it will have less buyer?
It seems not. The following is the yield of the US 30 years’ bond. It is currently at yearly low and lower low seems just be ahead. That means it still has lots of buyer. So why?
Besides the reason of risk-aversion, I think another reason can be seen from the simple bond-yield relation. The duration at low yield is higher than it at high yield. That means the P/L at low yield is bigger given same yield change. If I am a speculator and believe yield will go lower, I will buy bond even it already has very low yield. At this stage, the potential profit (in a short time) from yield going lower is high.

That said, if I am an investor, I won’t buy and hold. Bond has a theoretical max value, so the growth potential is limited.
Welcome to WordPress. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start blogging!